Red Sox would benefit from elimination of draft compensation
Why the Red Sox benefit if draft pick compensation is eliminated
Rob Manfred spoke to the media on Thursday regarding Major League Baseball’s ongoing lockdown. As the commissioner stumbled on projecting optimism while deflecting blame, he also revealed some things we can expect to include in MLB’s upcoming bargaining proposal on a new collective bargaining agreement. While that comes with the caveat that nothing is official yet, the potential for these changes should pique the interest of Boston Red Sox fans.
Among the biggest takeaways from that press conference, Manfred said the league agreed to both the implementation of a universal designated hitter and the elimination of draft compensation for free agents who reject qualifying offers.
Universal DH is great for baseball, no matter what some old-school traditionalists think. Players have been asking for this change for years. No one needs to watch a pitcher struggle at home plate and it’s time both leagues played by the same rules. The Red Sox will no longer need to bench one of their best sticks when visiting a National League park. There are some downsides for Boston, with increased competition to retain their current DH when it hits free agency, but the worry is outweighed by the upsides.
Eliminating draft pick compensation could have even bigger ramifications that swing in favor of the big teams in the market, including the Red Sox. Baseball’s chief officer Chaim Bloom has sought to balance his efforts to improve the major league roster to stay competitive in the present with building the farm system for the future. Those goals may conflict with each other when signing a better free agent to help win now costs the club a draft pick.
Under the previous CBA that expired in December, teams would lose their second-highest draft pick in the next MLB draft and $500,000 in international signing bonus money if they signed a player who turned down an offer. qualifying. Boston should be more willing to sign high-profile free agents if they’re no longer attached to those penalties.
The Red Sox have been reluctant to cross the luxury tax threshold in recent years and it wasn’t just to protect John Henry’s wallet. Teams that exceeded the tax were charged their second and fifth draft picks plus $1 million in international signing bonus money if they signed a free agent who declined a qualifying offer.
While they still have to proceed with some caution regarding the financial ramifications, Boston should be more willing to dip into the tax if they aren’t penalized by draft picks or lose money than they can spend on international songs.
According to Tim Dierkes of MLB Trade Rumors, teams will still be compensated for losing their best players to free agency, it just won’t come at the expense of the player’s new team. The proposal asks teams to receive draft picks for losing free agents, the value of which is determined by the quality of the player.
While this obviously benefits star free agents who would no longer have their markets hampered by being tied to a qualifying offer, the MLBPA may have concerns about how to determine player value in regards to the type of pick compensation. repechage it is worth. This could potentially lead to smaller market clubs having less incentive to re-sign some of their own players if that translates into more choice to sign cheaper talent. That means more veteran talent flooding the free agent market for teams like the Red Sox to bid on.
If draft selection compensation is completely eliminated, many clubs worried about whether they can afford their star players will be more willing to trade them before they reach free agency. The Red Sox, with their financial flexibility and improving agricultural system, would be ready to seize these opportunities.
Any change in the new CBA that alters or eliminates draft penalties for signing free agents is unlikely to become a significant roadblock for the Red Sox and has the potential to pave the way for greater spending in free agency. with fewer restrictions on their way.